Saturday, June 21, 2008

Why is the Philippine bar exam pass rate too low?

If you compare Philippine bar exam pass rate with that of the US, you'd realize ours is actually very low. A particular US state may have, on average, an overall pass rate of 80 percent, says attorneyatlove.blogspot.com. "On closer analysis the pass rate might be 90 percent for first-time takers, 75 percent for second-time takers, and 60 percent for third-time takers. Now why is ours hovering around just 20-30%? Among other issues, does this mean our legal system is more complex and advanced than that in the US? Not.

One can cite several valid factors why a bar examinee does not make the cut, like lack of preparation, too much pressure, poor handwriting, poor analytical skills, etc. But the way our bar exam and legal education system is being run must also be held accountable.

According to Wikipedia, the Philippine Bar Examination, administered once every year during the four Sundays of September and covering eight areas of law, is considered one of the most difficult bar exams in the world, having a passing rate that averages in the mere 20%-30% mark. That low passing rate is I think largely due to how poorly our legal education system prepares its students to become lawyers. Also, the bar exam is mainly designed to test one's knowledge of the law, both basic and complex provisions thereof. This may explain why the University of the Philippines College of Law, arguably the best law school in Asia, has a lower passing percentage among its bar exam takers than San Beda and Ateneo. Law schools like UP who prefer to teach students "how to think like a lawyer" but do not prepare law students for our particular type of bar exam, are at a disadvantage.

Bar exam reforms therefore must address how aspiring lawyers must be tested, specifically the criteria in determining what skills do we really need from our lawyers. Though I am quite relieved to be told by a bar reviewer who once served as bar examiner that some examiners put more premium on analytical and communication skills than rote knowledge of the law. As long as the answer is not obviously contrary to law, but analytically and logically sound, the examinee may be awarded full points, he said. However, this is not the case with many of the examiners.

Disclaimer

The articles in this blog are the writer's own opinion, views or report of facts, AND SHOULD NOT SUBSTITUTE for official documents or issuances, or the advice of an independent and competent legal counsel. We do not warrant the accuracy and suitability of these articles for whatever purpose you may have in copying them. Thank you.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Privacy Policy

This privacy policy tells you how we use personal information collected at this site. Please read this privacy policy before using the site or submitting any personal information. By using the site, you accept the practices described here.

Collection of Information
We collect personally identifiable information, like names, email addresses, etc., when voluntarily submitted by our visitors. The information you provide is used to fulfill your specific request, unless you give us permission to use it in another manner, for example, to add you to one of our mailing lists.

Cookie/Tracking Technology
Our site may use cookies and tracking technology which are useful for gathering information such as browser type and operating system, tracking the number of visitors to the site, and understanding how visitors use the Site. Personal information cannot be collected via cookies and other tracking technology, however, if you previously provided personally identifiable information, cookies may be tied to such information. Third parties such as our advertisers may also use cookies to collect information in the course of serving ads to you. Most web browsers automatically accept cookies, but you can usually modify your browser setting to decline cookies if you prefer.

Distribution of Information
We do not share your personally identifiable information to any third party for marketing purposes. However, we may share information with governmental agencies or other companies assisting us in fraud prevention or investigation. We may do so when: (1) permitted or required by law; or, (2) trying to protect against or prevent actual or potential fraud or unauthorized transactions; or, (3) investigating fraud which has already taken place.

Commitment to Data Security
Your personally identifiable information is kept secure. Only authorized staff of this site (who have agreed to keep information secure and confidential) have access to this information. All emails and newsletters from this site allow you to opt out of further mailings.

Privacy Contact Information
If you have any questions, concerns, or comments about our privacy policy you may contact us by email at barops@gmail.com.

We reserve the right to make changes to this policy. You are encouraged to review the privacy policy whenever you visit the site to make sure that you understand how any personal information you provide will be used.